{"id":19581,"date":"2022-05-31T20:14:00","date_gmt":"2022-05-31T20:14:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/?p=19581"},"modified":"2022-06-28T21:11:47","modified_gmt":"2022-06-28T21:11:47","slug":"section-230-does-not-apply-toretweet-because-author-said-hevouched-for-the-retweeted-article","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/section-230-does-not-apply-toretweet-because-author-said-hevouched-for-the-retweeted-article\/","title":{"rendered":"Section 230 Does Not Apply to Retweet Because Author Said He \u201cVouch[ed] for\u201d the Retweeted Article"},"content":{"rendered":"The Court held that Section 230 \u201cmay provide immunity for someone who merely shares a link on Twitter\u201d but \u201cit does not immunize someone for making additional remarks that are allegedly defamatory.\u201d \r\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
The Court held that Section 230 \u201cmay provide immunity for someone who merely shares a link on Twitter\u201d but \u201cit does not immunize someone for making additional remarks that are allegedly defamatory.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2373,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"article-topic":[1015,1025],"article-type":[1045],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n