{"id":16867,"date":"2021-06-30T19:46:00","date_gmt":"2021-06-30T19:46:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/?p=16867"},"modified":"2021-07-12T19:53:29","modified_gmt":"2021-07-12T19:53:29","slug":"ninth-circuit-finds-section-230-defense-inapplicable-in-snapchat-speed-filter-suit","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/ninth-circuit-finds-section-230-defense-inapplicable-in-snapchat-speed-filter-suit\/","title":{"rendered":"Ninth Circuit Finds Section 230 Defense Inapplicable in Snapchat Speed Filter Suit"},"content":{"rendered":"As the panel wrote, the defendants are not trying to hold Snap liable as a publisher under Section 230. Rather, Snap is liable for a negligently designed product as a manufacturer \u2014 a completely different role. ","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
As the panel wrote, the defendants are not trying to hold Snap liable as a publisher under Section 230. Rather, Snap is liable for a negligently designed product as a manufacturer \u2014 a completely different role.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2373,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"article-topic":[1022,1025],"article-type":[1045],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n