{"id":1229,"date":"2011-01-25T19:01:19","date_gmt":"2011-01-25T19:01:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/montz-v-pilgrim-films-television-inc-a-tale-of-two-conflicting-systems-of-ip-law\/"},"modified":"2020-10-05T19:37:01","modified_gmt":"2020-10-05T19:37:01","slug":"montz-v-pilgrim-films-television-inc-a-tale-of-two-conflicting-systems-of-ip-law","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/montz-v-pilgrim-films-television-inc-a-tale-of-two-conflicting-systems-of-ip-law\/","title":{"rendered":"Montz v. Pilgrim Films &#038; Television, Inc.: A Tale of Two Conflicting Systems Of IP Law"},"content":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"article-topic":[1032,1061],"article-type":[1045],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v22.4 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Montz v. Pilgrim Films &amp; Television, Inc.: A Tale of Two Conflicting Systems Of IP Law - Media Law Resource Center<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/montz-v-pilgrim-films-television-inc-a-tale-of-two-conflicting-systems-of-ip-law\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Montz v. Pilgrim Films &amp; Television, Inc.: A Tale of Two Conflicting Systems Of IP Law - Media Law Resource Center\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/montz-v-pilgrim-films-television-inc-a-tale-of-two-conflicting-systems-of-ip-law\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Media Law Resource Center\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-01-25T19:01:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-10-05T19:37:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"BFC Digital\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"BFC Digital\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"22 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/montz-v-pilgrim-films-television-inc-a-tale-of-two-conflicting-systems-of-ip-law\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/montz-v-pilgrim-films-television-inc-a-tale-of-two-conflicting-systems-of-ip-law\/\",\"name\":\"Montz v. Pilgrim Films & Television, Inc.: A Tale of Two Conflicting Systems Of IP Law - Media Law Resource Center\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-01-25T19:01:19+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-10-05T19:37:01+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/#\/schema\/person\/975eb9d2791034fe9d76208a95cad1e7\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/montz-v-pilgrim-films-television-inc-a-tale-of-two-conflicting-systems-of-ip-law\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/montz-v-pilgrim-films-television-inc-a-tale-of-two-conflicting-systems-of-ip-law\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/montz-v-pilgrim-films-television-inc-a-tale-of-two-conflicting-systems-of-ip-law\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Article\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/articles\/type\/article\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Montz v. Pilgrim Films &#038; Television, Inc.: A Tale of Two Conflicting Systems Of IP Law\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/\",\"name\":\"Media Law Resource Center\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/#\/schema\/person\/975eb9d2791034fe9d76208a95cad1e7\",\"name\":\"BFC Digital\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9c4fa3c9af41ae1c161448a3ada945f7?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9c4fa3c9af41ae1c161448a3ada945f7?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"BFC Digital\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/author\/admin\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Montz v. Pilgrim Films & Television, Inc.: A Tale of Two Conflicting Systems Of IP Law - Media Law Resource Center","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/montz-v-pilgrim-films-television-inc-a-tale-of-two-conflicting-systems-of-ip-law\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Montz v. Pilgrim Films & Television, Inc.: A Tale of Two Conflicting Systems Of IP Law - Media Law Resource Center","og_url":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/montz-v-pilgrim-films-television-inc-a-tale-of-two-conflicting-systems-of-ip-law\/","og_site_name":"Media Law Resource Center","article_published_time":"2011-01-25T19:01:19+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-10-05T19:37:01+00:00","author":"BFC Digital","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"BFC Digital","Est. reading time":"22 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/montz-v-pilgrim-films-television-inc-a-tale-of-two-conflicting-systems-of-ip-law\/","url":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/montz-v-pilgrim-films-television-inc-a-tale-of-two-conflicting-systems-of-ip-law\/","name":"Montz v. Pilgrim Films & Television, Inc.: A Tale of Two Conflicting Systems Of IP Law - Media Law Resource Center","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-01-25T19:01:19+00:00","dateModified":"2020-10-05T19:37:01+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/#\/schema\/person\/975eb9d2791034fe9d76208a95cad1e7"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/montz-v-pilgrim-films-television-inc-a-tale-of-two-conflicting-systems-of-ip-law\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/medialaw.org\/montz-v-pilgrim-films-television-inc-a-tale-of-two-conflicting-systems-of-ip-law\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/montz-v-pilgrim-films-television-inc-a-tale-of-two-conflicting-systems-of-ip-law\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Article","item":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/articles\/type\/article\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Montz v. Pilgrim Films &#038; Television, Inc.: A Tale of Two Conflicting Systems Of IP Law"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/","name":"Media Law Resource Center","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/#\/schema\/person\/975eb9d2791034fe9d76208a95cad1e7","name":"BFC Digital","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9c4fa3c9af41ae1c161448a3ada945f7?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9c4fa3c9af41ae1c161448a3ada945f7?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"BFC Digital"},"url":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/author\/admin\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1229"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1229"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1229\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":14325,"href":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1229\/revisions\/14325"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1229"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"article-topic","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/article-topic?post=1229"},{"taxonomy":"article-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/article-type?post=1229"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}