{"id":8749,"date":"2019-02-01T20:11:24","date_gmt":"2019-02-01T20:11:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/medialawletter-january-2019\/"},"modified":"2020-08-20T19:01:05","modified_gmt":"2020-08-20T19:01:05","slug":"medialawletter-january-2019","status":"publish","type":"post_issue","link":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-january-2019\/","title":{"rendered":"MediaLawLetter January 2019"},"content":{"rendered":"
Download Publication<\/a><\/p>\n From the Executive Director\u2019s Desk: Entertainment Conference Explores #MeToo, IP, and Social Media Backlash<\/a><\/p>\n 10 Questions to a Media Lawyer: Ashley Kissinger<\/a><\/p>\n S.D. Fla.: Courts Grants BuzzFeed Summary Judgment in Dossier Case<\/a> 11th Cir.: Media Coalition Supports Rehearing En Banc on Applicability of Georgia Anti-SLAPP Law in Federal Court<\/a> D.C. Anti-SLAPP Law: 2018 in Review<\/a><\/p>\n Does the Texas Anti-SLAPP Law Apply in Federal Court? \u2026. Stay Tuned<\/a><\/p>\n N.Y. Sup.: WPIX Granted Two Summary Judgments: No Gross Irresponsibility<\/a> Neb. Dist.: Court Rejects Newspaper Reporter\u2019s Challenge to Coverage of His Scuffle with Parking Attendant<\/a> E.D. Mich.: Court Grants Summary Judgment in Public Official Defamation Action<\/a> Puerto Rico Dist. Court Declines to Address Preemption Challenge to Drone Regulation<\/a> Canada\u2019s Supreme Court Declines to Change Test for Media Production Orders<\/a> 1st Cir.: Juror Names and Addresses Remain Public in the Age of Social Media<\/a> The State of Transparency in the Commonwealth of Kentucky<\/a><\/p>\nMLRC<\/h3>\n
DEFAMATION & PRIVACY<\/h3>\n
Gubarev v. BuzzFeed, Inc.<\/p>\n
Carbone v. Cable News Network<\/p>\n
Gallipoli v. Nicoletti et al. & Starlight Rainbow v. WPIX<\/p>\n
Cooper v. WOWT-Channel 6 Gray Television Group<\/p>\n
\u201cNow more than ever we depend upon the free press\u2026\u201d <\/em>
Jones v. Scripps Media<\/p>\nNEWSGATHERING<\/h3>\n
Pan Am v. Municipality of San Juan<\/p>\nINTERNATIONAL<\/h3>\n
R. v. Vice Media Canada Inc.<\/p>\nACCESS<\/h3>\n
U.S. v. Chin<\/p>\nDATA PRIVACY<\/h3>\n