{"id":8462,"date":"2018-09-07T18:36:59","date_gmt":"2018-09-07T18:36:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/medialawletter-august-2018\/"},"modified":"2020-08-20T19:01:06","modified_gmt":"2020-08-20T19:01:06","slug":"medialawletter-august-2018","status":"publish","type":"post_issue","link":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-august-2018\/","title":{"rendered":"MediaLawLetter August 2018"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"pdf\"<\/a><\/strong> Download Publication<\/a><\/p>\n

MLRC<\/h3>\n

From the Executive Director\u2019s Desk: Trump v. the Media: We Must Push Back<\/a><\/p>\n

Ten Questions to a Media Lawyer: Bob Latham, Jackson Walker<\/a><\/p>\n

INTERNET<\/h3>\n

Cal.: Hassell v. Yelp: California Supreme Court Affirms Broad Section 230 Immunity<\/a>
Hassell v. Bird<\/p>\n

ACCESS<\/h3>\n

Florida Supreme Court Declines Review of Order Releasing Parkland Surveillance Videos<\/a>
School Bd. of Broward Cty. v. Cable News Network; State Attorney\u2019s Office v. Cable News Network<\/p>\n

LIBEL & PRIVACY<\/h3>\n

D.C. Superior Court Granted Anti-SLAPP Special Motion to Dismiss Suit Arising From \u201cTrump Dossier\u201d<\/a>
Khan v. Orbis Business Intelligence Ltd.<\/p>\n

S.D.W. Va.: Federal Court Dispenses With Pharmacist\u2019s Defamation Case Against CBS
<\/a>Ballengee v. CBS Broadcasting Inc.<\/p>\n

Mich. Cir.: Summary Disposition Granted for Detroit News Station in Defamation Suit by Local Businessman<\/a>
Shumake v. Wolchek<\/p>\n

Nev. Dist.: Court Grants Anti-SLAPP Motion by the Associated Press on Fair Report Grounds<\/a>
Wynn v. The Associated Press<\/p>\n

Va. Cir.: Court Dismisses Right-Of-Publicity Claim Involving Oscar and Emmy Nominated Documentary Film<\/a>
Barber v. Kartemquin Films Ltd.<\/p>\n

S.D. Fla.: Florida Federal Court Dismisses Lawsuit by Former Major League Baseball Player Against AP, ESPN, and USA Today<\/a>
Claim Time Barred Under NY Law; Article Substantially Correct; A Fair Report <\/em>
Nix. v. ESPN et al.<\/p>\n

MISCELLANEOUS<\/h3>\n

The \u201cWeaponization\u201d of Freedom of Speech<\/a>
Does NIFLA v. Becerra Demonstrate a Flaw in the First Amendment, or Just a Flaw in its Application?<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":79,"template":"","issues-publication":[1002],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nMediaLawLetter August 2018 - Media Law Resource Center<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-august-2018\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"MediaLawLetter August 2018 - Media Law Resource Center\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\" Download Publication MLRC From the Executive Director\u2019s Desk: Trump v. the Media: We Must Push Back Ten Questions to a Media Lawyer: Bob Latham, Jackson Walker INTERNET Cal.: Hassell v. Yelp: California Supreme Court Affirms Broad Section 230 ImmunityHassell v. Bird ACCESS Florida Supreme Court Declines Review of Order Releasing Parkland Surveillance VideosSchool Bd. of...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-august-2018\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Media Law Resource Center\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-08-20T19:01:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/03\/pdf_small.gif\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"16\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"16\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/gif\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-august-2018\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-august-2018\/\",\"name\":\"MediaLawLetter August 2018 - Media Law Resource Center\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-august-2018\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-august-2018\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/03\/pdf_small.gif\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-09-07T18:36:59+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-08-20T19:01:06+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-august-2018\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-august-2018\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-august-2018\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/03\/pdf_small.gif\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/03\/pdf_small.gif\",\"width\":16,\"height\":16,\"caption\":\"pdf\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-august-2018\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"MediaLawLetter\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issues\/publication\/medialawletter\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"MediaLawLetter August 2018\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/\",\"name\":\"Media Law Resource Center\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"MediaLawLetter August 2018 - Media Law Resource Center","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-august-2018\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"MediaLawLetter August 2018 - Media Law Resource Center","og_description":" Download Publication MLRC From the Executive Director\u2019s Desk: Trump v. the Media: We Must Push Back Ten Questions to a Media Lawyer: Bob Latham, Jackson Walker INTERNET Cal.: Hassell v. Yelp: California Supreme Court Affirms Broad Section 230 ImmunityHassell v. Bird ACCESS Florida Supreme Court Declines Review of Order Releasing Parkland Surveillance VideosSchool Bd. of...","og_url":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-august-2018\/","og_site_name":"Media Law Resource Center","article_modified_time":"2020-08-20T19:01:06+00:00","og_image":[{"width":16,"height":16,"url":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/03\/pdf_small.gif","type":"image\/gif"}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-august-2018\/","url":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-august-2018\/","name":"MediaLawLetter August 2018 - Media Law Resource Center","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-august-2018\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-august-2018\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/03\/pdf_small.gif","datePublished":"2018-09-07T18:36:59+00:00","dateModified":"2020-08-20T19:01:06+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-august-2018\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-august-2018\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-august-2018\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/03\/pdf_small.gif","contentUrl":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/03\/pdf_small.gif","width":16,"height":16,"caption":"pdf"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-august-2018\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"MediaLawLetter","item":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issues\/publication\/medialawletter\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"MediaLawLetter August 2018"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/","name":"Media Law Resource Center","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/post_issue\/8462"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/post_issue"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post_issue"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/79"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8462"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"issues-publication","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/issues-publication?post=8462"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}