{"id":5990,"date":"2015-07-30T22:02:53","date_gmt":"2015-07-30T22:02:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/medialawletter-july-2015\/"},"modified":"2020-08-20T19:01:14","modified_gmt":"2020-08-20T19:01:14","slug":"medialawletter-july-2015","status":"publish","type":"post_issue","link":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-july-2015\/","title":{"rendered":"MediaLawLetter July 2015"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/a><\/strong> Download Publication<\/a><\/p>\n From the Executive Director\u2019s Desk <\/a> E.D. Pa.: Unsealing the Cosby Documents<\/a> Wis. Cir.: Ex-Firefighter\u2019s Defamation Claim Extinguished<\/a> 6th Cir.: Single Publication Rule Bars Former American Idol Contestants’ Libel Suit<\/a> N.Y. App.: New York Court Reduces Damage Award for Libelous Online Review<\/a> Or. App.: Oregon Court of Appeals Strikes SLAPP Suit Against TV Station<\/a> Tex. App.: Appeals Court Reverses Denial of Publisher\u2019s Anti-SLAPP Motion in \u201cShoot on Sight\u201d Libel Lawsuit<\/a> Tex. App.: Texas Court of Appeals Reverses Wiretap Conviction<\/a> 6th Cir.: Developments in the Emerging Law of Butt Dialing<\/a> From the MLRC Next Gen Committee<\/a> N.D. Ill.: Backpage.com Obtains TRO to Stop Interference with Payment Processing for Adult Ads<\/a> Wash. App.: Washington Court Provides Standard for Unmasking Anonymous Posters (Sort Of)<\/a> 2d Cir.: Director Does Not Have a Separate Copyright in Contributions Integrated in a Motion Picture<\/a>MLRC<\/h3>\n
Ken Stabler: R.I.P. – and the Story of a Libel Case<\/em><\/p>\nLIBEL & PRIVACY<\/h3>\n
Comedian Voluntarily Narrowed His Zone of Privacy<\/em>
Constand v. Cosby<\/p>\n
\u201cKelly\u2019s Court\u201d Segment on Disability Recipient Protected Opinion<\/em>
Marjala v. Fox News Network<\/p>\n
Online Articles Are Not Perpetually Actionable Under Tennessee Defamation Law<\/em>
Clark v. Viacom<\/p>\n
$125,000 Award Cut to $100<\/em>
Lynn & Cahill v. Witkin<\/p>\n
No Likelihood of Success on Negligence and Emotional Distress Claims<\/em>
Mullen v. Meredith Corp.<\/p>\n
Dallas Morning News, Inc. v. Mapp<\/p>\n
Coach Had No Privacy Interest in Locker Room Talks <\/em>
Long v. Texas<\/p>\n
Huff et al v. Spaw<\/p>\nINTERNET<\/h3>\n
Is the Right to Be Forgotten Among Our Unalienable Rights?<\/em><\/p>\n
Pressure on Credit Card Companies Threatened Irreparable First Amendment Injury<\/em>
Backpage.com v. Dart<\/p>\n
Standard May Vary Based on Nature of Speech <\/em>
Thomson v. Doe<\/p>\nINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY<\/h3>\n
Director Cannot Interfere with Producer\u2019s Exploitation of the Film<\/em>
16 Casa Duse v. Merkin<\/p>\n