{"id":5990,"date":"2015-07-30T22:02:53","date_gmt":"2015-07-30T22:02:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/medialawletter-july-2015\/"},"modified":"2020-08-20T19:01:14","modified_gmt":"2020-08-20T19:01:14","slug":"medialawletter-july-2015","status":"publish","type":"post_issue","link":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-july-2015\/","title":{"rendered":"MediaLawLetter July 2015"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"pdf\"<\/a><\/strong> Download Publication<\/a><\/p>\n

MLRC<\/h3>\n

From the Executive Director\u2019s Desk <\/a>
Ken Stabler: R.I.P. – and the Story of a Libel Case<\/em><\/p>\n

LIBEL & PRIVACY<\/h3>\n

E.D. Pa.: Unsealing the Cosby Documents<\/a>
Comedian Voluntarily Narrowed His Zone of Privacy<\/em>
Constand v. Cosby<\/p>\n

Wis. Cir.: Ex-Firefighter\u2019s Defamation Claim Extinguished<\/a>
\u201cKelly\u2019s Court\u201d Segment on Disability Recipient Protected Opinion<\/em>
Marjala v. Fox News Network<\/p>\n

6th Cir.: Single Publication Rule Bars Former American Idol Contestants’ Libel Suit<\/a>
Online Articles Are Not Perpetually Actionable Under Tennessee Defamation Law<\/em>
Clark v. Viacom<\/p>\n

N.Y. App.: New York Court Reduces Damage Award for Libelous Online Review<\/a>
$125,000 Award Cut to $100<\/em>
Lynn & Cahill v. Witkin<\/p>\n

Or. App.: Oregon Court of Appeals Strikes SLAPP Suit Against TV Station<\/a>
No Likelihood of Success on Negligence and Emotional Distress Claims<\/em>
Mullen v. Meredith Corp.<\/p>\n

Tex. App.: Appeals Court Reverses Denial of Publisher\u2019s Anti-SLAPP Motion in \u201cShoot on Sight\u201d Libel Lawsuit<\/a>
Dallas Morning News, Inc. v. Mapp<\/p>\n

Tex. App.: Texas Court of Appeals Reverses Wiretap Conviction<\/a>
Coach Had No Privacy Interest in Locker Room Talks <\/em>
Long v. Texas<\/p>\n

6th Cir.: Developments in the Emerging Law of Butt Dialing<\/a>
Huff et al v. Spaw<\/p>\n

INTERNET<\/h3>\n

From the MLRC Next Gen Committee<\/a>
Is the Right to Be Forgotten Among Our Unalienable Rights?<\/em><\/p>\n

N.D. Ill.: Backpage.com Obtains TRO to Stop Interference with Payment Processing for Adult Ads<\/a>
Pressure on Credit Card Companies Threatened Irreparable First Amendment Injury<\/em>
Backpage.com v. Dart<\/p>\n

Wash. App.: Washington Court Provides Standard for Unmasking Anonymous Posters (Sort Of)<\/a>
Standard May Vary Based on Nature of Speech  <\/em>
Thomson v. Doe<\/p>\n

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY<\/h3>\n

2d Cir.: Director Does Not Have a Separate Copyright in Contributions Integrated in a Motion Picture<\/a>
Director Cannot Interfere with Producer\u2019s Exploitation of the Film<\/em>
16 Casa Duse v. Merkin<\/p>\n

C.D. Cal.: Streaming Service FilmOn Found to be Eligible for Statutory Broadcast Retransmission License<\/a>
Alki David Gets First Win, But FCC or Congress Could Have Last Word<\/em>
Fox Television Stations, Inc. v. FilmOn X, LLC<\/p>\n

EMPLOYMENT<\/h3>\n

2d Cir.: The Second Circuit\u2019s New Primary Beneficiary Test<\/a>
When Are Interns Entitled to Wages and Overtime?<\/em>
Glatt v. Fox Searchlight Pictures, Inc.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":79,"template":"","issues-publication":[1002],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nMediaLawLetter July 2015 - Media Law Resource Center<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-july-2015\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"MediaLawLetter July 2015 - Media Law Resource Center\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\" Download Publication MLRC From the Executive Director\u2019s Desk Ken Stabler: R.I.P. – and the Story of a Libel Case LIBEL & PRIVACY E.D. Pa.: Unsealing the Cosby DocumentsComedian Voluntarily Narrowed His Zone of PrivacyConstand v. Cosby Wis. Cir.: Ex-Firefighter\u2019s Defamation Claim Extinguished\u201cKelly\u2019s Court\u201d Segment on Disability Recipient Protected OpinionMarjala v. Fox News Network 6th Cir.:...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-july-2015\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Media Law Resource Center\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-08-20T19:01:14+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/03\/pdf_small.gif\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"16\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"16\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/gif\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-july-2015\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-july-2015\/\",\"name\":\"MediaLawLetter July 2015 - Media Law Resource Center\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-july-2015\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-july-2015\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/03\/pdf_small.gif\",\"datePublished\":\"2015-07-30T22:02:53+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-08-20T19:01:14+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-july-2015\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-july-2015\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-july-2015\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/03\/pdf_small.gif\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/03\/pdf_small.gif\",\"width\":16,\"height\":16,\"caption\":\"pdf\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-july-2015\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"MediaLawLetter\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issues\/publication\/medialawletter\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"MediaLawLetter July 2015\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/\",\"name\":\"Media Law Resource Center\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"MediaLawLetter July 2015 - Media Law Resource Center","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-july-2015\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"MediaLawLetter July 2015 - Media Law Resource Center","og_description":" Download Publication MLRC From the Executive Director\u2019s Desk Ken Stabler: R.I.P. – and the Story of a Libel Case LIBEL & PRIVACY E.D. Pa.: Unsealing the Cosby DocumentsComedian Voluntarily Narrowed His Zone of PrivacyConstand v. Cosby Wis. Cir.: Ex-Firefighter\u2019s Defamation Claim Extinguished\u201cKelly\u2019s Court\u201d Segment on Disability Recipient Protected OpinionMarjala v. Fox News Network 6th Cir.:...","og_url":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-july-2015\/","og_site_name":"Media Law Resource Center","article_modified_time":"2020-08-20T19:01:14+00:00","og_image":[{"width":16,"height":16,"url":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/03\/pdf_small.gif","type":"image\/gif"}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-july-2015\/","url":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-july-2015\/","name":"MediaLawLetter July 2015 - Media Law Resource Center","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-july-2015\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-july-2015\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/03\/pdf_small.gif","datePublished":"2015-07-30T22:02:53+00:00","dateModified":"2020-08-20T19:01:14+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-july-2015\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-july-2015\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-july-2015\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/03\/pdf_small.gif","contentUrl":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/03\/pdf_small.gif","width":16,"height":16,"caption":"pdf"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-july-2015\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"MediaLawLetter","item":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issues\/publication\/medialawletter\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"MediaLawLetter July 2015"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/","name":"Media Law Resource Center","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/post_issue\/5990"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/post_issue"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post_issue"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/79"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5990"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"issues-publication","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/issues-publication?post=5990"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}