{"id":5489,"date":"2015-01-01T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2015-01-01T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/medialawletter-december-2014-table-of-contents\/"},"modified":"2020-10-12T21:41:26","modified_gmt":"2020-10-12T21:41:26","slug":"medialawletter-december-2014-table-of-contents","status":"publish","type":"post_issue","link":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-december-2014-table-of-contents\/","title":{"rendered":"MediaLawLetter December 2014"},"content":{"rendered":"
Download Publication<\/a><\/p>\n From the Executive Director’s Desk<\/a> DCS Annual Meeting<\/a> Fla.: \u201cLeave the Gun, Take the Cannoli\u201d<\/a> D. Minn.: Court Denies Defendant\u2019s Post-Trial Motions in Jesse Ventura Libel Case<\/a> La. App.: Libel Claim Over Newspaper Headline Reinstated <\/a> Second Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment In Big Short Libel Case<\/a> Ill.: Legislature Passes New Eavesdropping Law<\/a> Kan. Dist.: Court Lifts Prior Restraint on \u201cIn Cold Blood\u201d Investigation Files <\/a> S.D. Fla.: Court Strikes Florida Lawyer-Advertising Rules <\/a> The SAVE Act: Will Congressional Efforts to Stem Sex Trafficking Undermine Section 230?<\/a> Ariz. App.: Appeals Court Prohibits Secret Witness Testimony In Criminal Trial<\/a> Fla. App.: Court Holds Open Meeting Law Applies to Collective Bargaining<\/a>MLRC<\/h3>\n
\nSony Hack and the Press<\/em><\/p>\n
\nThis Year’s Accomplishments and Plans for 2015<\/em><\/p>\nLIBEL & PRIVACY<\/h3>\n
\nJurors Reject Ex-Mafia Enforcer\u2019s Defamation Claim<\/em>
\nMilano v. Halifax Media Holdings, LLC, Daytona Beach News Journal<\/p>\n
\nSufficient Evidence of Actual Malice; Court Allows Unjust Enrichment Damages<\/em>
\nVentura v. Kyle<\/p>\n
\nHeadline Stating Lawyer \u201cDeserts Client\u201d Was False and Defamatory <\/em>
\nBrown v. Times Picayune<\/p>\n
\nMany Challenged Statements Lacked Defamatory Meaning<\/em>
\nChau v. Lewis<\/p>\n
\nBill Awaits Governor\u2019s Signature<\/em><\/p>\nPRIOR RESTRAINT<\/h3>\n
\nFirst Amendment Trumps State and Family Privacy Interests in Old Criminal Case Files<\/em>
\nKansas v. Nye<\/p>\nCOMMERCIAL SPEECH<\/h3>\n
\nState Bar\u2019s \u201cNaked Paternalism\u201d Violates First Amendment<\/em>
\nRubenstein v. The Florida Bar<\/p>\nINTERNET<\/h3>\n
\nH.R. 4225, S. 2536<\/p>\nACCESS<\/h3>\n
\nCourt Rejects Murder Defendant\u2019s Bid for Closed Testimony<\/em>
\nKPNX-TV Channel 12, et al. v. Stephens<\/p>\n
\nVoids a Pension Agreement Reached During Federal Mediation<\/em>
\nBrown v. Denton<\/p>\n