{"id":5040,"date":"2014-05-12T20:10:16","date_gmt":"2014-05-12T20:10:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/medialawletter-associate-edition-2014-issue-1\/"},"modified":"2020-08-20T19:01:44","modified_gmt":"2020-08-20T19:01:44","slug":"medialawletter-associate-edition-2014-issue-1","status":"publish","type":"post_issue","link":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-associate-edition-2014-issue-1\/","title":{"rendered":"MediaLawLetter Associate Edition 2014 Issue 1"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"pdf\" Download Publication<\/a><\/p>\n

Libel & Privacy<\/h3>\n

UK:\t\t\t\tAcross the Pond: UK Media Law Developments<\/a>
No Special Constitutional Rights for Journalists; Prince Charles’ Diary and More<\/em>
Miranda v Secretary of State for Home Department; R (Evans) v Attorney General; R (BSkyB) v Commissioner of Police<\/p>\n

Privy Council: \tJournalist’s Conviction for ‘Scandalising the Court’ Overturned by Privy Council<\/a>
Offense Can No Longer Be Treated as a Strict Liability Crime<\/em>
Dhooharika v Director of Public Prosecutions<\/p>\n

Canada:\t\t\tResearcher-Participant Privilege Is Established in Canada<\/a>
Court Recognizes Need to Protect Promises of Confidentiality in Academic Research<\/em>
Parent c. R.<\/p>\n

ECHR:\t\t\tMLRC Joins Coalition Seeking Grand Chamber Review in Delfi v. Estonia<\/a>
ECHR Held News Portal Could Be Liable for User Comments<\/em><\/p>\n

REPORTERS PRIVILEGE<\/h3>\n

Singapore \t\tCourt of Appeal Rejects Request For Pre-Action Disclosure of Journalist’s Sources<\/a>
Court Took Note of Public Interest in Exposing Corruption<\/em>
Dorsey v. World Sports Group<\/p>\n

Australia:\t\t\tThe Development of Shield Laws in Australia and the Growing Quest for Journalists’ Sources<\/a><\/p>\n

ACCESS<\/h3>\n

UK:\t\t\t\tWall Street Journal Wins UK Access Motion<\/a>
Phone-hacking Prosecutors Must Supply Exhibits, No Strings Attached<\/em><\/p>\n

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY<\/h3>\n

European Court of Justice Rules on Hyperlinks and Copyright Liability<\/a>
How Does Decision Compare to US and Canadian Approaches?<\/em>
Svensson v. Retriever Sverige AB<\/p>\n

Ninth Circuit Orders Take-Down of “Innocence of Muslims” Video<\/a>
Novel and Controversial Application of Copyright Law<\/em>
Garcia v. Google<\/p>\n

2d Cir.:\t\t\tCircuit Affords Protection to News Organizations That Report on Copyrightable Material<\/a>
Publication of Content of Analyst Call Fair Use<\/em>
Swatch Group Management Services Ltd. v. Bloomberg L.P.<\/p>\n

COMMERCIAL SPEECH<\/h3>\n

7th Cir.: \t\t\tCourt Reinstates Trademark and Publicity Claims Over Sports Illustrated Page<\/a>
Supermarket’s Page Congratulating Michael Jordan Ruled Commercial Speech<\/em>
Jordan v. Jewel Food Stores, Inc.<\/p>\n

BROADCAST<\/h3>\n

D.C. Circuit Strikes Down FCC’s Open Internet Rules<\/a>
But the FCC Will Live to Fight Another Day<\/em>
Verizon v. FCC<\/p>\n

MLRC<\/h3>\n

MLRC Miami Conference Explores Challenges and Opportunities in Cross-Border Publishing<\/a><\/p>\n

2014 MLRC\/Southwestern Law School 11th Annual Media and Entertainment Law Conference<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":79,"template":"","issues-publication":[1002],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nMediaLawLetter Associate Edition 2014 Issue 1 - Media Law Resource Center<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-associate-edition-2014-issue-1\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"MediaLawLetter Associate Edition 2014 Issue 1 - Media Law Resource Center\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\" Download Publication Libel & Privacy UK: Across the Pond: UK Media Law DevelopmentsNo Special Constitutional Rights for Journalists; Prince Charles’ Diary and MoreMiranda v Secretary of State for Home Department; R (Evans) v Attorney General; R (BSkyB) v Commissioner of Police Privy Council: Journalist’s Conviction for ‘Scandalising the Court’ Overturned by Privy CouncilOffense Can No...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-associate-edition-2014-issue-1\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Media Law Resource Center\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-08-20T19:01:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/03\/pdf_small.gif\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"16\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"16\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/gif\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-associate-edition-2014-issue-1\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-associate-edition-2014-issue-1\/\",\"name\":\"MediaLawLetter Associate Edition 2014 Issue 1 - Media Law Resource Center\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-associate-edition-2014-issue-1\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-associate-edition-2014-issue-1\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/03\/pdf_small.gif\",\"datePublished\":\"2014-05-12T20:10:16+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-08-20T19:01:44+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-associate-edition-2014-issue-1\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-associate-edition-2014-issue-1\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-associate-edition-2014-issue-1\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/03\/pdf_small.gif\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/03\/pdf_small.gif\",\"width\":16,\"height\":16,\"caption\":\"pdf\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-associate-edition-2014-issue-1\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"MediaLawLetter\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issues\/publication\/medialawletter\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"MediaLawLetter Associate Edition 2014 Issue 1\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/\",\"name\":\"Media Law Resource Center\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"MediaLawLetter Associate Edition 2014 Issue 1 - Media Law Resource Center","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-associate-edition-2014-issue-1\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"MediaLawLetter Associate Edition 2014 Issue 1 - Media Law Resource Center","og_description":" Download Publication Libel & Privacy UK: Across the Pond: UK Media Law DevelopmentsNo Special Constitutional Rights for Journalists; Prince Charles’ Diary and MoreMiranda v Secretary of State for Home Department; R (Evans) v Attorney General; R (BSkyB) v Commissioner of Police Privy Council: Journalist’s Conviction for ‘Scandalising the Court’ Overturned by Privy CouncilOffense Can No...","og_url":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-associate-edition-2014-issue-1\/","og_site_name":"Media Law Resource Center","article_modified_time":"2020-08-20T19:01:44+00:00","og_image":[{"width":16,"height":16,"url":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/03\/pdf_small.gif","type":"image\/gif"}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-associate-edition-2014-issue-1\/","url":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-associate-edition-2014-issue-1\/","name":"MediaLawLetter Associate Edition 2014 Issue 1 - Media Law Resource Center","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-associate-edition-2014-issue-1\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-associate-edition-2014-issue-1\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/03\/pdf_small.gif","datePublished":"2014-05-12T20:10:16+00:00","dateModified":"2020-08-20T19:01:44+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-associate-edition-2014-issue-1\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-associate-edition-2014-issue-1\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-associate-edition-2014-issue-1\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/03\/pdf_small.gif","contentUrl":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/03\/pdf_small.gif","width":16,"height":16,"caption":"pdf"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-associate-edition-2014-issue-1\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"MediaLawLetter","item":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issues\/publication\/medialawletter\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"MediaLawLetter Associate Edition 2014 Issue 1"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/","name":"Media Law Resource Center","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/post_issue\/5040"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/post_issue"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post_issue"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/79"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5040"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"issues-publication","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/issues-publication?post=5040"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}