{"id":5040,"date":"2014-05-12T20:10:16","date_gmt":"2014-05-12T20:10:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/medialawletter-associate-edition-2014-issue-1\/"},"modified":"2020-08-20T19:01:44","modified_gmt":"2020-08-20T19:01:44","slug":"medialawletter-associate-edition-2014-issue-1","status":"publish","type":"post_issue","link":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-associate-edition-2014-issue-1\/","title":{"rendered":"MediaLawLetter Associate Edition 2014 Issue 1"},"content":{"rendered":"
Download Publication<\/a><\/p>\n UK:\t\t\t\tAcross the Pond: UK Media Law Developments<\/a> Privy Council: \tJournalist’s Conviction for ‘Scandalising the Court’ Overturned by Privy Council<\/a> Canada:\t\t\tResearcher-Participant Privilege Is Established in Canada<\/a> ECHR:\t\t\tMLRC Joins Coalition Seeking Grand Chamber Review in Delfi v. Estonia<\/a> Singapore \t\tCourt of Appeal Rejects Request For Pre-Action Disclosure of Journalist’s Sources<\/a> Australia:\t\t\tThe Development of Shield Laws in Australia and the Growing Quest for Journalists’ Sources<\/a><\/p>\n UK:\t\t\t\tWall Street Journal Wins UK Access Motion<\/a> European Court of Justice Rules on Hyperlinks and Copyright Liability<\/a> Ninth Circuit Orders Take-Down of “Innocence of Muslims” Video<\/a> 2d Cir.:\t\t\tCircuit Affords Protection to News Organizations That Report on Copyrightable Material<\/a> 7th Cir.: \t\t\tCourt Reinstates Trademark and Publicity Claims Over Sports Illustrated Page<\/a> D.C. Circuit Strikes Down FCC’s Open Internet Rules<\/a> MLRC Miami Conference Explores Challenges and Opportunities in Cross-Border Publishing<\/a><\/p>\nLibel & Privacy<\/h3>\n
No Special Constitutional Rights for Journalists; Prince Charles’ Diary and More<\/em>
Miranda v Secretary of State for Home Department; R (Evans) v Attorney General; R (BSkyB) v Commissioner of Police<\/p>\n
Offense Can No Longer Be Treated as a Strict Liability Crime<\/em>
Dhooharika v Director of Public Prosecutions<\/p>\n
Court Recognizes Need to Protect Promises of Confidentiality in Academic Research<\/em>
Parent c. R.<\/p>\n
ECHR Held News Portal Could Be Liable for User Comments<\/em><\/p>\nREPORTERS PRIVILEGE<\/h3>\n
Court Took Note of Public Interest in Exposing Corruption<\/em>
Dorsey v. World Sports Group<\/p>\nACCESS<\/h3>\n
Phone-hacking Prosecutors Must Supply Exhibits, No Strings Attached<\/em><\/p>\nINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY<\/h3>\n
How Does Decision Compare to US and Canadian Approaches?<\/em>
Svensson v. Retriever Sverige AB<\/p>\n
Novel and Controversial Application of Copyright Law<\/em>
Garcia v. Google<\/p>\n
Publication of Content of Analyst Call Fair Use<\/em>
Swatch Group Management Services Ltd. v. Bloomberg L.P.<\/p>\nCOMMERCIAL SPEECH<\/h3>\n
Supermarket’s Page Congratulating Michael Jordan Ruled Commercial Speech<\/em>
Jordan v. Jewel Food Stores, Inc.<\/p>\nBROADCAST<\/h3>\n
But the FCC Will Live to Fight Another Day<\/em>
Verizon v. FCC<\/p>\nMLRC<\/h3>\n