{"id":4953,"date":"2014-04-01T20:09:20","date_gmt":"2014-04-01T20:09:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/medialawletter-march-2014\/"},"modified":"2020-08-20T19:01:45","modified_gmt":"2020-08-20T19:01:45","slug":"medialawletter-march-2014","status":"publish","type":"post_issue","link":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-march-2014\/","title":{"rendered":"MediaLawLetter March 2014"},"content":{"rendered":"
Download Publication<\/a><\/p>\n MLRC Miami Conference Explores Challenges and Opportunities in Cross-Border Publishing<\/a> Ninth Circuit Orders Take-Down of \u201cInnocence of Muslims\u201d Video<\/a> 2d Cir.: Circuit Affords Protection to News Organizations That Report on Copyrightable Material<\/a> Virginia Supreme Court Affirms JNOV for Virginian-Pilot Newspaper<\/a> Pa. C.C.P.: Doctor Awarded $2 Million in Libel Trial Against Pennsylvania Newspaper<\/a> Pa. Super.: Court Orders Third Trial in Long-Running Newspaper Libel Case<\/a> Mass. Super.: Activist Wins $563,000 Defamation, Negligent Infliction Emotional Distress Verdict<\/a> Mass. Super.: Libel Suit Over \u201cBag Men\u201d New York Post Report Survives Motion to Dismiss<\/a> Tex. App.: Texas Court Affirms Dismissal of Libel Case Against New York Times<\/a> Colo. Dist.: Colorado Court Dismisses Libel Case Against Homicide Hunter Program<\/a> Ariz. Cir.: Emotional Distress Suit Over Suicide Broadcast Dismissed<\/a> M.D. Fla.: Mugshot Website Entitled to Five-Day Notice of Defamation Suit<\/a> Illinois Supreme Court Strikes State Eavesdropping Law As Unconstitutional<\/a> D.C. Super.: \u2018L\u2019etat C\u2019est Moi\u2019 Is Not a Concept Recognized by Tort Law<\/a> Fifth Circuit Issues First Texas Anti-SLAPP Decision<\/a> Australia: The Development of Shield Laws in Australia and the Growing Quest for Journalists’ Sources<\/a><\/p>\n NTSB: Judge Shoots Down Drone Regulation in Photographer’s Case<\/a> M.D. Fla.: Court Rules Lawyer\u2019s $1 Million Challenge Didn\u2019t Create Unilateral Contract<\/a> Keeping Communications Confidential<\/a><\/p>\nMLRC<\/h3>\n
Legal Issues Concerning Hispanic and Latin American Media<\/em><\/p>\nINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY<\/h3>\n
Novel and Controversial Application of Copyright Law<\/em>
Garcia v. Google<\/p>\n
Publication of Content of Analyst Call Fair Use<\/em>
Swatch Group Management Services Ltd. v. Bloomberg L.P.<\/p>\nLIBEL & PRIVACY<\/h3>\n
Court Analyzes Defamation by Implication Standards<\/em>
Phillip Webb v. Virginian-Pilot<\/p>\n
Newspaper to Appeal on Proof of Falsity and Implication Grounds <\/em>
Menkowitz v. Peerless Publications<\/p>\n
Holds Trial Court Erred on Proof of Damages Issues<\/em>
Joseph v. The Scranton Times<\/p>\n
Almost All Damages for Emotional Distress<\/em>
Marinova v. Boston Herald<\/p>\n
Paper Implied Men Were Suspects; Fair Report Privilege Rejected<\/em>
Barhoum v. NYP Holdings, Inc.<\/p>\n
Plaintiff Failed to Show Actual Malice<\/em>
Darby v. The New York Times Company<\/p>\n
Crime Reenactment Was Substantially True<\/em>
Cooley v. Kenda<\/p>\n
Claim Barred by First Amendment<\/em>
Rodriguez v. News Corporation<\/p>\n
Website a \u201cMedia Defendant\u201d Under Florida Notice Law<\/em>
Intihar v. Citizens Information Associates<\/p>\n
Statute Overbroad Under the First Amendment <\/em>
People v. Clark \/ People v. Melongo<\/p>\n
To Unmask Informant, Corporation Must Show Actual Business Harm<\/em>
Solers, Inc. v. John Doe<\/p>\n
Court\u2019s Ruling Leaves Dentist Smiling, Questions Unanswered<\/em>
NCDR, L.L.C. v. Mauze & Bagby<\/p>\nINTERNATIONAL<\/h3>\n
NEWSGATHERING<\/h3>\n
FAA Immediately Appeals Ruling<\/em>
Huerta v. Pirker<\/p>\nNEWS AND UPDATES<\/h3>\n
Unedited Dateline Interview Showed No Contract Was Made<\/em>
Kolodziej v. Mason<\/p>\nA VIEW FROM THE INSIDE \u2014 MLRC\u2019s NEW COLUMN FROM IN-HOUSE COUNSEL<\/h3>\n
ETHICS<\/h3>\n