{"id":4953,"date":"2014-04-01T20:09:20","date_gmt":"2014-04-01T20:09:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/medialawletter-march-2014\/"},"modified":"2020-08-20T19:01:45","modified_gmt":"2020-08-20T19:01:45","slug":"medialawletter-march-2014","status":"publish","type":"post_issue","link":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-march-2014\/","title":{"rendered":"MediaLawLetter March 2014"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"pdf\" Download Publication<\/a><\/p>\n

MLRC<\/h3>\n

MLRC Miami Conference Explores Challenges and Opportunities in Cross-Border Publishing<\/a>
Legal Issues Concerning Hispanic and Latin American Media<\/em><\/p>\n

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY<\/h3>\n

Ninth Circuit Orders Take-Down of \u201cInnocence of Muslims\u201d Video<\/a>
Novel and Controversial Application of  Copyright Law<\/em>
Garcia v. Google<\/p>\n

2d Cir.: Circuit Affords Protection to News Organizations That Report on Copyrightable Material<\/a>
Publication of Content of Analyst Call Fair Use<\/em>
Swatch Group Management Services Ltd. v. Bloomberg L.P.<\/p>\n

LIBEL & PRIVACY<\/h3>\n

Virginia Supreme Court Affirms JNOV for Virginian-Pilot Newspaper<\/a>
Court Analyzes Defamation by Implication Standards<\/em>
Phillip Webb v. Virginian-Pilot<\/p>\n

Pa. C.C.P.: Doctor Awarded $2 Million in Libel Trial Against Pennsylvania Newspaper<\/a>
Newspaper to Appeal on Proof of Falsity and Implication Grounds                    <\/em>
Menkowitz v. Peerless Publications<\/p>\n

Pa. Super.: Court Orders Third Trial in Long-Running Newspaper Libel Case<\/a>
Holds Trial Court Erred on Proof of Damages Issues<\/em>
Joseph v. The Scranton Times<\/p>\n

Mass. Super.: Activist Wins $563,000 Defamation, Negligent Infliction Emotional Distress Verdict<\/a>
Almost All Damages for Emotional Distress<\/em>
Marinova v. Boston Herald<\/p>\n

Mass. Super.: Libel Suit Over \u201cBag Men\u201d New York Post Report Survives Motion to Dismiss<\/a>
Paper Implied Men Were Suspects; Fair Report Privilege Rejected<\/em>
Barhoum v. NYP Holdings, Inc.<\/p>\n

Tex. App.: Texas Court Affirms Dismissal of Libel Case Against New York Times<\/a>
Plaintiff Failed to Show Actual Malice<\/em>
Darby v. The New York Times Company<\/p>\n

Colo. Dist.: Colorado Court Dismisses Libel Case Against Homicide Hunter Program<\/a>
Crime Reenactment Was Substantially True<\/em>
Cooley v. Kenda<\/p>\n

Ariz. Cir.: Emotional Distress Suit Over Suicide Broadcast Dismissed<\/a>
Claim Barred by First Amendment<\/em>
Rodriguez v. News Corporation<\/p>\n

M.D. Fla.: Mugshot Website Entitled to Five-Day Notice of Defamation Suit<\/a>
Website a \u201cMedia Defendant\u201d Under Florida Notice Law<\/em>
Intihar v. Citizens Information Associates<\/p>\n

Illinois Supreme Court Strikes State Eavesdropping Law As Unconstitutional<\/a>
Statute Overbroad Under the First Amendment <\/em>
People v. Clark \/ People v. Melongo<\/p>\n

D.C. Super.: \u2018L\u2019etat C\u2019est Moi\u2019 Is Not a Concept Recognized by Tort Law<\/a>
To Unmask Informant, Corporation Must Show Actual Business Harm<\/em>
Solers, Inc. v. John Doe<\/p>\n

Fifth Circuit Issues First Texas Anti-SLAPP Decision<\/a>
Court\u2019s Ruling Leaves Dentist Smiling, Questions Unanswered<\/em>
NCDR, L.L.C. v. Mauze & Bagby<\/p>\n

INTERNATIONAL<\/h3>\n

Australia: The Development of Shield Laws in Australia and the Growing Quest for Journalists’ Sources<\/a><\/p>\n

NEWSGATHERING<\/h3>\n

NTSB: Judge Shoots Down Drone Regulation in Photographer’s Case<\/a>
FAA Immediately Appeals Ruling<\/em>
Huerta v. Pirker<\/p>\n

NEWS AND UPDATES<\/h3>\n

M.D. Fla.: Court Rules Lawyer\u2019s $1 Million Challenge Didn\u2019t Create Unilateral Contract<\/a>
Unedited Dateline Interview Showed No Contract Was Made<\/em>
Kolodziej v. Mason<\/p>\n

A VIEW FROM THE INSIDE \u2014 MLRC\u2019s NEW COLUMN FROM IN-HOUSE COUNSEL<\/h3>\n

Keeping Communications Confidential<\/a><\/p>\n

ETHICS<\/h3>\n

Ethics, Aspirations, and the Animal House Standard<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":79,"template":"","issues-publication":[1002],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nMediaLawLetter March 2014 - Media Law Resource Center<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-march-2014\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"MediaLawLetter March 2014 - Media Law Resource Center\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\" Download Publication MLRC MLRC Miami Conference Explores Challenges and Opportunities in Cross-Border PublishingLegal Issues Concerning Hispanic and Latin American Media INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY Ninth Circuit Orders Take-Down of \u201cInnocence of Muslims\u201d Video Novel and Controversial Application of  Copyright LawGarcia v. Google 2d Cir.: Circuit Affords Protection to News Organizations That Report on Copyrightable MaterialPublication of Content...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-march-2014\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Media Law Resource Center\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-08-20T19:01:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/03\/pdf_small.gif\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"16\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"16\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/gif\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-march-2014\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-march-2014\/\",\"name\":\"MediaLawLetter March 2014 - Media Law Resource Center\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-march-2014\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-march-2014\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/03\/pdf_small.gif\",\"datePublished\":\"2014-04-01T20:09:20+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-08-20T19:01:45+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-march-2014\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-march-2014\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-march-2014\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/03\/pdf_small.gif\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/03\/pdf_small.gif\",\"width\":16,\"height\":16,\"caption\":\"pdf\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-march-2014\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"MediaLawLetter\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issues\/publication\/medialawletter\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"MediaLawLetter March 2014\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/\",\"name\":\"Media Law Resource Center\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"MediaLawLetter March 2014 - Media Law Resource Center","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-march-2014\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"MediaLawLetter March 2014 - Media Law Resource Center","og_description":" Download Publication MLRC MLRC Miami Conference Explores Challenges and Opportunities in Cross-Border PublishingLegal Issues Concerning Hispanic and Latin American Media INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY Ninth Circuit Orders Take-Down of \u201cInnocence of Muslims\u201d Video Novel and Controversial Application of  Copyright LawGarcia v. Google 2d Cir.: Circuit Affords Protection to News Organizations That Report on Copyrightable MaterialPublication of Content...","og_url":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-march-2014\/","og_site_name":"Media Law Resource Center","article_modified_time":"2020-08-20T19:01:45+00:00","og_image":[{"width":16,"height":16,"url":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/03\/pdf_small.gif","type":"image\/gif"}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-march-2014\/","url":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-march-2014\/","name":"MediaLawLetter March 2014 - Media Law Resource Center","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-march-2014\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-march-2014\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/03\/pdf_small.gif","datePublished":"2014-04-01T20:09:20+00:00","dateModified":"2020-08-20T19:01:45+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-march-2014\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-march-2014\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-march-2014\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/03\/pdf_small.gif","contentUrl":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/03\/pdf_small.gif","width":16,"height":16,"caption":"pdf"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-march-2014\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"MediaLawLetter","item":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issues\/publication\/medialawletter\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"MediaLawLetter March 2014"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/","name":"Media Law Resource Center","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/post_issue\/4953"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/post_issue"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post_issue"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/79"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4953"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"issues-publication","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/issues-publication?post=4953"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}