{"id":4790,"date":"2013-01-01T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2013-01-01T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/medialawletter-associate-edition-2013-issue-3\/"},"modified":"2020-10-12T21:37:21","modified_gmt":"2020-10-12T21:37:21","slug":"medialawletter-associate-edition-2013-issue-3","status":"publish","type":"post_issue","link":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-associate-edition-2013-issue-3\/","title":{"rendered":"MediaLawLetter Associate Edition 2013 Issue 3"},"content":{"rendered":"

MLRC<\/h3>\n

MLRC London Conference Explores International Media Law Developments<\/a>
Delegates from Around the World Discuss Media Law and Policy Developments<\/em><\/p>\n

INTERNATIONAL LIBEL & PRIVACY<\/h3>\n

5th Cir.: Appeals Court Applies SPEECH Act and Refuses to Enforce Canadian Defamation Judgment<\/a>
First Appellate Court Ruling under New Law on Enforcement of Foreign Defamation Judgments<\/em>
Trout Point Lodge, Limited v. Handshoe<\/p>\n

Across the Pond: Updates on UK Media Law<\/a>
Defamation Act, Leveson, Lance Armstrong and More<\/em><\/p>\n

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY<\/h3>\n

D.D.C.: Court Enjoins Internet Streaming Service<\/a>
DC Becomes Second Court To Reject Technology-Based Exception To The Copyright Act<\/em>
Fox Television Stations, Inc. et al. v. FilmOn X LLC<\/p>\n

W.D. Wisc.: Wisconsin Federal Judge Finds Satirical T-Shirt of Mayor Is Fair Use<\/a>
Use of Photo Was Transformative<\/em>
Kienitz v. Sconnie Nation<\/p>\n

W.D. Tex.: Aliens and Cowpokes Invade a Texas Federal Court<\/a>
Hollywood Movie Did Not Infringe Self-Published Comic<\/em>
Busti v. Platinum Studios<\/p>\n

2d Cir.: Court Rules in Favor of Appropriation Artist Richard Prince<\/a>
Transformative Use Based on Broad Suite of Aesthetic Considerations<\/em>
Cariou v. Prince<\/p>\n

N.D. Miss.: Court Dismisses Favorite Son Faulkner’s “Midnight in Paris” Infringement Suit<\/a>
Estate Sued Over Single Line from Novel<\/em>
Faulkner Literary Rights, LLC v. Sony Pictures Classics Inc.<\/p>\n

Ninth Circuit Affirms Refusal to Enjoin Ad-Skipping Service<\/a>
Decision Cabined by Deferential Standard of Review<\/em>
Fox Broadcasting Company v. Dish Network LLC<\/p>\n

S.D.N.Y.: When Amazon Becomes the Strand Bookstore<\/a>
The ReDigi Case\u2014Whether US Copyright Law Permits Resale of “Used” Digital Goods<\/em>
Capitol Records, LLC v. ReDigi Inc.<\/p>\n

N.D. Ind.: Free Speech in Gotham: First Amendment Protects Warner Bros. Against Trademark Claims Based on Fictional Software in The Dark Knight Rises<\/a>
Helpful Guidance on Use of Fictional Products in Entertainment<\/em>
Fortres Grand Corp. v. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.<\/p>\n

Second Circuit Reinstates “Own Your Power” Trademark Claims Against Oprah and Hearst<\/a>
Fair Use Not Established as a Matter of Law on Motion to Dismiss<\/em>
Kelly-Brown v. Winfrey<\/p>\n

S.D.N.Y. Denies Class Certification in Mass Copyright Claim Against YouTube<\/a>
Individualized Facts in Action Make Class Action Unsuitable<\/em>
Football Ass’n Premier League Ltd. v. YouTube, Inc.<\/p>\n

REPORTERS PRIVILEGE<\/h3>\n

Fourth Circuit Reverses Order Allowing Reporter James Risen to Protect Source<\/a>
Majority Rejects First Amendment and Common Law Privilege<\/em>
United States v. Sterling (James Risen intervenor)<\/p>\n

N.Y. App.: Divided First Department Says Strong Public Policy Favors Protecting Confidential Sources<\/a>
But Will Not Save Fox News Reporter From Out of State Subpoena<\/em>
In re Holmes v. Winter<\/p>\n

D. Mass.: Court Awards Newspaper Legal Costs Incurred in Filing Motion to Quash Subpoena to Reporter<\/a>
Subpoena a Transparent Fishing Expedition<\/em>
Durand v. Massachusetts Dep’t of Health<\/p>\n

N.Y. Sup.: Court Quashes Sheldon Adelson’s Third-Party Subpoena to Wall Street Journal<\/a>
Failed to Overcome Statute’s Three-Part Test<\/em>
In re Wall Street Journal v. Adelson<\/p>\n

S.D.N.Y.: Federal Court Quashes Subpoena Seeking Reporter’s Eye-Witness Testimony<\/a>
Privilege Attaches to Non-confidential, Firsthand Observations<\/em>
Lebowitz v. City of New York<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","issues-publication":[1002],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nMediaLawLetter Associate Edition 2013 Issue 3 - Media Law Resource Center<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-associate-edition-2013-issue-3\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"MediaLawLetter Associate Edition 2013 Issue 3 - Media Law Resource Center\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"MLRC MLRC London Conference Explores International Media Law DevelopmentsDelegates from Around the World Discuss Media Law and Policy Developments INTERNATIONAL LIBEL & PRIVACY 5th Cir.: Appeals Court Applies SPEECH Act and Refuses to Enforce Canadian Defamation JudgmentFirst Appellate Court Ruling under New Law on Enforcement of Foreign Defamation JudgmentsTrout Point Lodge, Limited v. Handshoe Across...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-associate-edition-2013-issue-3\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Media Law Resource Center\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-10-12T21:37:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-associate-edition-2013-issue-3\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-associate-edition-2013-issue-3\/\",\"name\":\"MediaLawLetter Associate Edition 2013 Issue 3 - Media Law Resource Center\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2013-01-01T00:00:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-10-12T21:37:21+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-associate-edition-2013-issue-3\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-associate-edition-2013-issue-3\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-associate-edition-2013-issue-3\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"MediaLawLetter\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issues\/publication\/medialawletter\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"MediaLawLetter Associate Edition 2013 Issue 3\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/\",\"name\":\"Media Law Resource Center\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"MediaLawLetter Associate Edition 2013 Issue 3 - Media Law Resource Center","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-associate-edition-2013-issue-3\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"MediaLawLetter Associate Edition 2013 Issue 3 - Media Law Resource Center","og_description":"MLRC MLRC London Conference Explores International Media Law DevelopmentsDelegates from Around the World Discuss Media Law and Policy Developments INTERNATIONAL LIBEL & PRIVACY 5th Cir.: Appeals Court Applies SPEECH Act and Refuses to Enforce Canadian Defamation JudgmentFirst Appellate Court Ruling under New Law on Enforcement of Foreign Defamation JudgmentsTrout Point Lodge, Limited v. Handshoe Across...","og_url":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-associate-edition-2013-issue-3\/","og_site_name":"Media Law Resource Center","article_modified_time":"2020-10-12T21:37:21+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-associate-edition-2013-issue-3\/","url":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-associate-edition-2013-issue-3\/","name":"MediaLawLetter Associate Edition 2013 Issue 3 - Media Law Resource Center","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/#website"},"datePublished":"2013-01-01T00:00:00+00:00","dateModified":"2020-10-12T21:37:21+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-associate-edition-2013-issue-3\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-associate-edition-2013-issue-3\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-associate-edition-2013-issue-3\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"MediaLawLetter","item":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issues\/publication\/medialawletter\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"MediaLawLetter Associate Edition 2013 Issue 3"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/","name":"Media Law Resource Center","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/post_issue\/4790"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/post_issue"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post_issue"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4790"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"issues-publication","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/issues-publication?post=4790"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}