{"id":4790,"date":"2013-01-01T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2013-01-01T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/medialawletter-associate-edition-2013-issue-3\/"},"modified":"2020-10-12T21:37:21","modified_gmt":"2020-10-12T21:37:21","slug":"medialawletter-associate-edition-2013-issue-3","status":"publish","type":"post_issue","link":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-associate-edition-2013-issue-3\/","title":{"rendered":"MediaLawLetter Associate Edition 2013 Issue 3"},"content":{"rendered":"
MLRC London Conference Explores International Media Law Developments<\/a> 5th Cir.: Appeals Court Applies SPEECH Act and Refuses to Enforce Canadian Defamation Judgment<\/a> Across the Pond: Updates on UK Media Law<\/a> D.D.C.: Court Enjoins Internet Streaming Service<\/a> W.D. Wisc.: Wisconsin Federal Judge Finds Satirical T-Shirt of Mayor Is Fair Use<\/a> W.D. Tex.: Aliens and Cowpokes Invade a Texas Federal Court<\/a> 2d Cir.: Court Rules in Favor of Appropriation Artist Richard Prince<\/a> N.D. Miss.: Court Dismisses Favorite Son Faulkner’s “Midnight in Paris” Infringement Suit<\/a> Ninth Circuit Affirms Refusal to Enjoin Ad-Skipping Service<\/a> S.D.N.Y.: When Amazon Becomes the Strand Bookstore<\/a> N.D. Ind.: Free Speech in Gotham: First Amendment Protects Warner Bros. Against Trademark Claims Based on Fictional Software in The Dark Knight Rises<\/a> Second Circuit Reinstates “Own Your Power” Trademark Claims Against Oprah and Hearst<\/a> S.D.N.Y. Denies Class Certification in Mass Copyright Claim Against YouTube<\/a> Fourth Circuit Reverses Order Allowing Reporter James Risen to Protect Source<\/a> N.Y. App.: Divided First Department Says Strong Public Policy Favors Protecting Confidential Sources<\/a> D. Mass.: Court Awards Newspaper Legal Costs Incurred in Filing Motion to Quash Subpoena to Reporter<\/a>
Delegates from Around the World Discuss Media Law and Policy Developments<\/em><\/p>\nINTERNATIONAL LIBEL & PRIVACY<\/h3>\n
First Appellate Court Ruling under New Law on Enforcement of Foreign Defamation Judgments<\/em>
Trout Point Lodge, Limited v. Handshoe<\/p>\n
Defamation Act, Leveson, Lance Armstrong and More<\/em><\/p>\nINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY<\/h3>\n
DC Becomes Second Court To Reject Technology-Based Exception To The Copyright Act<\/em>
Fox Television Stations, Inc. et al. v. FilmOn X LLC<\/p>\n
Use of Photo Was Transformative<\/em>
Kienitz v. Sconnie Nation<\/p>\n
Hollywood Movie Did Not Infringe Self-Published Comic<\/em>
Busti v. Platinum Studios<\/p>\n
Transformative Use Based on Broad Suite of Aesthetic Considerations<\/em>
Cariou v. Prince<\/p>\n
Estate Sued Over Single Line from Novel<\/em>
Faulkner Literary Rights, LLC v. Sony Pictures Classics Inc.<\/p>\n
Decision Cabined by Deferential Standard of Review<\/em>
Fox Broadcasting Company v. Dish Network LLC<\/p>\n
The ReDigi Case\u2014Whether US Copyright Law Permits Resale of “Used” Digital Goods<\/em>
Capitol Records, LLC v. ReDigi Inc.<\/p>\n
Helpful Guidance on Use of Fictional Products in Entertainment<\/em>
Fortres Grand Corp. v. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.<\/p>\n
Fair Use Not Established as a Matter of Law on Motion to Dismiss<\/em>
Kelly-Brown v. Winfrey<\/p>\n
Individualized Facts in Action Make Class Action Unsuitable<\/em>
Football Ass’n Premier League Ltd. v. YouTube, Inc.<\/p>\nREPORTERS PRIVILEGE<\/h3>\n
Majority Rejects First Amendment and Common Law Privilege<\/em>
United States v. Sterling (James Risen intervenor)<\/p>\n
But Will Not Save Fox News Reporter From Out of State Subpoena<\/em>
In re Holmes v. Winter<\/p>\n
Subpoena a Transparent Fishing Expedition<\/em>
Durand v. Massachusetts Dep’t of Health<\/p>\n