{"id":4297,"date":"2013-06-03T20:00:22","date_gmt":"2013-06-03T20:00:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/medialawletter-may-2013\/"},"modified":"2020-08-20T19:01:48","modified_gmt":"2020-08-20T19:01:48","slug":"medialawletter-may-2013","status":"publish","type":"post_issue","link":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-may-2013\/","title":{"rendered":"MediaLawLetter May 2013"},"content":{"rendered":"

\ufeff\"pdf\" Download Publication<\/a><\/p>\n

MLRC<\/h3>\n

Sixth Annual Legal Frontiers in Digital Media Conference<\/a>
Managing a Data Breach, Privacy Class Actions, IP and Business Issues, Perspectives from Venture Capitalists and more <\/em><\/p>\n

LIBEL & PRIVACY<\/h3>\n

3d Cir.: Court Reinstates Right of Publicity Suit Over NCAA Football Video Game<\/a>
Use Was Not Transformative to Defeat Claim<\/em>
Hart v. Electronic Arts<\/p>\n

Wash.: Court Reinstates Libel Damage Award Over Communism Allegation<\/a>
Statement Held Not Opinion or Protected Political Speech<\/em>
Duc Tan vs. Le<\/p>\n

N.D. Ill.: Bomb Bystander\u2019s False Light Fizzles<\/a>
TV Reenactment Was Accurate and Not Defamatory<\/em>
Butler v. Discovery Communications LLC<\/p>\n

S.D.N.Y.: Court Grants Summary Judgment in Libel Case Arising Out of Michael Lewis\u2019s The Big Short<\/a>
Opinion, Substantial Truth, Lack of Defamatory Meaning Defeat Claim<\/em>
Chau v. Lewis<\/p>\n

N.Y. Sup.: Court Dismisses Libel and Related Claims Against Vanity Fair<\/a>
Plaintiff Failed to Plead Falsity or Fault<\/em>
Cassini v. Advance Publications, Inc.<\/p>\n

Ill. Cir.: Summary Judgment for Chicago Tribune in Mistaken Identity Defamation Case<\/a>
Lack of Evidence of Actual Malice<\/em>
Rivera v. Gibson<\/p>\n

Tex. App.: Texas Newspaper and Source Win Anti-SLAPP Motion on Appeal<\/a>
Plaintiffs Failed to Show Prima Facie Case<\/em>
Newspaper Holdings, Inc. v. Crazy Hotel Assisted Living, Ltd.<\/p>\n

Tex.: Not Defamatory Per Se to Question Doctor\u2019s Truthfulness<\/a>
Truthfulness Not Peculiar or Unique to Being a Physician<\/em>
Hancock v. Variyam<\/p>\n

Illinois Circuit Court Grants Summary Judgment in \u201cWrong Picture\u201d Defamation <\/a>
Fair Report Privilege Applied<\/em>
Buchanan v. ChicagoLand Television News<\/p>\n

Wash.: State Enacts Uniform Correction and Clarification Law<\/a>
Expressly Applies to Electronic Publications<\/em>
ESB 5236<\/p>\n

REPORTERS PRIVILEGE<\/h3>\n

Hawaii Shield Law Set to Lapse on June 30th Under Sunset Provision<\/a>
Legislature Fails to Agree on Renewal<\/em><\/p>\n

ACCESS<\/h3>\n

U.S.: Supreme Court Upholds Virginia\u2019s Citizen-Requester Only FOIA Provision
<\/a>Not Even Nate Silver Could Have Predicted This<\/em>
McBurney v. Young<\/p>\n

Virginia Supreme Court Set to Interpret Cameras-In-Courtroom Law<\/a>
Media Seek Broad “Good Cause” Standard<\/em>
Virginia Broadcasting Corp. v. Commonwealth of Virginia<\/p>\n

D.C. Cir. Affirms Bin Laden Death Photos Exempt From FOIA Disclosure<\/a>
Properly Withheld to Prevent Violence Against America<\/em>
Judicial Watch v. Department of Defense<\/p>\n

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY<\/h3>\n

Copyright, Fair Use & Orphan Works<\/a>
Legal Conundrums in the Use and Misappropriation of Photographs and Visual Images <\/em><\/p>\n

9th Cir.: Court Affirms that Righthaven Lacks Standing to Pursue Copyright Claims<\/a>
Declines to Rule on Fair Use Defense <\/em>
Righthaven LLC v. Hoehn<\/p>\n

S.D.N.Y.: YouTube Wins Summary Judgment Again in Battle with Viacom<\/a>
Video Sharing Platform Protected by DMCA Safe Harbor Provision <\/em>
Viacom Int’l Inc. v. YouTube, Inc.<\/p>\n

INTERNATIONAL<\/h3>\n

England: The New Defamation Act 2013<\/a>
What Difference Will It Really Make?<\/em><\/p>\n

ETHICS<\/h3>\n

Ethics Corner Special: The Legal Ethics of Social Networking<\/a>
(Part I of II)<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":79,"template":"","issues-publication":[1002],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nMediaLawLetter May 2013 - Media Law Resource Center<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-may-2013\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"MediaLawLetter May 2013 - Media Law Resource Center\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"\ufeff Download Publication MLRC Sixth Annual Legal Frontiers in Digital Media ConferenceManaging a Data Breach, Privacy Class Actions, IP and Business Issues, Perspectives from Venture Capitalists and more LIBEL & PRIVACY 3d Cir.: Court Reinstates Right of Publicity Suit Over NCAA Football Video GameUse Was Not Transformative to Defeat ClaimHart v. Electronic Arts Wash.: Court Reinstates...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-may-2013\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Media Law Resource Center\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-08-20T19:01:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/03\/pdf_small.gif\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"16\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"16\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/gif\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-may-2013\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-may-2013\/\",\"name\":\"MediaLawLetter May 2013 - Media Law Resource Center\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-may-2013\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-may-2013\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/03\/pdf_small.gif\",\"datePublished\":\"2013-06-03T20:00:22+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-08-20T19:01:48+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-may-2013\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-may-2013\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-may-2013\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/03\/pdf_small.gif\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/03\/pdf_small.gif\",\"width\":16,\"height\":16,\"caption\":\"pdf\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-may-2013\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"MediaLawLetter\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issues\/publication\/medialawletter\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"MediaLawLetter May 2013\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/\",\"name\":\"Media Law Resource Center\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"MediaLawLetter May 2013 - Media Law Resource Center","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-may-2013\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"MediaLawLetter May 2013 - Media Law Resource Center","og_description":"\ufeff Download Publication MLRC Sixth Annual Legal Frontiers in Digital Media ConferenceManaging a Data Breach, Privacy Class Actions, IP and Business Issues, Perspectives from Venture Capitalists and more LIBEL & PRIVACY 3d Cir.: Court Reinstates Right of Publicity Suit Over NCAA Football Video GameUse Was Not Transformative to Defeat ClaimHart v. Electronic Arts Wash.: Court Reinstates...","og_url":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-may-2013\/","og_site_name":"Media Law Resource Center","article_modified_time":"2020-08-20T19:01:48+00:00","og_image":[{"width":16,"height":16,"url":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/03\/pdf_small.gif","type":"image\/gif"}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-may-2013\/","url":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-may-2013\/","name":"MediaLawLetter May 2013 - Media Law Resource Center","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-may-2013\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-may-2013\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/03\/pdf_small.gif","datePublished":"2013-06-03T20:00:22+00:00","dateModified":"2020-08-20T19:01:48+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-may-2013\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-may-2013\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-may-2013\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/03\/pdf_small.gif","contentUrl":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/03\/pdf_small.gif","width":16,"height":16,"caption":"pdf"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-may-2013\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"MediaLawLetter","item":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issues\/publication\/medialawletter\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"MediaLawLetter May 2013"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/","name":"Media Law Resource Center","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/post_issue\/4297"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/post_issue"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post_issue"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/79"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4297"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"issues-publication","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/issues-publication?post=4297"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}