{"id":4047,"date":"2012-01-01T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2012-01-01T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/medialawletter-associate-edition-2012-issue-4\/"},"modified":"2020-10-12T21:37:24","modified_gmt":"2020-10-12T21:37:24","slug":"medialawletter-associate-edition-2012-issue-4","status":"publish","type":"post_issue","link":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-associate-edition-2012-issue-4\/","title":{"rendered":"MediaLawLetter Associate Edition 2012 Issue 4"},"content":{"rendered":"

MLRC<\/h3>\n

MLRC 2012 Annual Dinner<\/a>
Andrea Mitchell, Alex Castellanos and Governor Edward Rendell Discuss Money, Messaging and the Media in the 2012 Presidential Campaign<\/em><\/p>\n

MLRC Forum on Challenges of Digital Technologies on Television Business Models<\/a>
Minutes from the MLRC Annual Meeting<\/em><\/p>\n

INTERNATIONAL LIBEL AND PRIVAn CY<\/h3>\n

UK: Lord Leveson Issues Report on the Culture, Practices and Ethics of the Press<\/a>
Proposal for Press Regulation is Likely to Change Forever the UK Press<\/em><\/p>\n

Canada: “Defamatory Libel” in Canada<\/a>
Ottawa Restaurateur Given 90 Day Jail Sentence<\/em><\/p>\n

UK\/Europe: Other Side of the Pond: Update on UK and European Media Law Developments<\/a>
Troubles at the BBC, Elton John Libel Case, Comic Wins Libel Trial, Contempt Reform and More<\/em><\/p>\n

Australian Court Finds Google  Liable for Defamatory Search Results<\/a>
What Does This Decision Mean for Internet Service Providers?<\/em>
Trkulja v Google Inc and Google Australia Pty Ltd<\/p>\n

INTERNET<\/h3>\n

2012 MLRC Survey of Actions to Identify Newspaper Website Commenters<\/a>
Newspapers See High Rate of Success in Protecting Identity of Commenters<\/em><\/p>\n

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY<\/h3>\n

C.D. Cal.:  Court Denies Fox\u2019s Motion For A Preliminary Injunction Enjoining Dish Network\u2019s Commercial-Skipping DVR<\/a>
Fox Broadcasting Co. Inc. v. Dish Network<\/em><\/p>\n

REPORTERS PRIVILEGE<\/h3>\n

U.S.: Cert. Petition Filed in Belfast Project Subpoena Case<\/a>
Journalists Ask Supreme Court to Clarify Source Protection in Criminal Context<\/em>
Moloney and McIntyre v. Holder<\/p>\n

LEGISLATION<\/h3>\n

Congress’s Media Agenda for the Year Ahead<\/a>
2013 Promises to Be an Interesting Year<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","issues-publication":[1002],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nMediaLawLetter Associate Edition 2012 Issue 4 - Media Law Resource Center<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-associate-edition-2012-issue-4\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"MediaLawLetter Associate Edition 2012 Issue 4 - Media Law Resource Center\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"MLRC MLRC 2012 Annual DinnerAndrea Mitchell, Alex Castellanos and Governor Edward Rendell Discuss Money, Messaging and the Media in the 2012 Presidential Campaign MLRC Forum on Challenges of Digital Technologies on Television Business ModelsMinutes from the MLRC Annual Meeting INTERNATIONAL LIBEL AND PRIVAn CY UK: Lord Leveson Issues Report on the Culture, Practices and Ethics...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-associate-edition-2012-issue-4\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Media Law Resource Center\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-10-12T21:37:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-associate-edition-2012-issue-4\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-associate-edition-2012-issue-4\/\",\"name\":\"MediaLawLetter Associate Edition 2012 Issue 4 - Media Law Resource Center\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2012-01-01T00:00:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-10-12T21:37:24+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-associate-edition-2012-issue-4\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-associate-edition-2012-issue-4\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-associate-edition-2012-issue-4\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"MediaLawLetter\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issues\/publication\/medialawletter\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"MediaLawLetter Associate Edition 2012 Issue 4\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/\",\"name\":\"Media Law Resource Center\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"MediaLawLetter Associate Edition 2012 Issue 4 - Media Law Resource Center","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-associate-edition-2012-issue-4\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"MediaLawLetter Associate Edition 2012 Issue 4 - Media Law Resource Center","og_description":"MLRC MLRC 2012 Annual DinnerAndrea Mitchell, Alex Castellanos and Governor Edward Rendell Discuss Money, Messaging and the Media in the 2012 Presidential Campaign MLRC Forum on Challenges of Digital Technologies on Television Business ModelsMinutes from the MLRC Annual Meeting INTERNATIONAL LIBEL AND PRIVAn CY UK: Lord Leveson Issues Report on the Culture, Practices and Ethics...","og_url":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-associate-edition-2012-issue-4\/","og_site_name":"Media Law Resource Center","article_modified_time":"2020-10-12T21:37:24+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-associate-edition-2012-issue-4\/","url":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-associate-edition-2012-issue-4\/","name":"MediaLawLetter Associate Edition 2012 Issue 4 - Media Law Resource Center","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/#website"},"datePublished":"2012-01-01T00:00:00+00:00","dateModified":"2020-10-12T21:37:24+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-associate-edition-2012-issue-4\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-associate-edition-2012-issue-4\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-associate-edition-2012-issue-4\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"MediaLawLetter","item":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issues\/publication\/medialawletter\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"MediaLawLetter Associate Edition 2012 Issue 4"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/","name":"Media Law Resource Center","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/post_issue\/4047"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/post_issue"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post_issue"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4047"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"issues-publication","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/issues-publication?post=4047"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}