{"id":4012,"date":"2013-02-07T20:35:38","date_gmt":"2013-02-07T20:35:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/medialawletter-january-2013\/"},"modified":"2020-08-20T19:01:53","modified_gmt":"2020-08-20T19:01:53","slug":"medialawletter-january-2013","status":"publish","type":"post_issue","link":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-january-2013\/","title":{"rendered":"MediaLawLetter January 2013"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"pdf\" Download Publication<\/a><\/p>\n

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY<\/h3>\n

S.D.N.Y.:  The True Meaning of \u2018Service\u2019: Media Entities Struggle With Court Interpretation of Twitter\u2019s Terms of Service and What Services Getty Provides<\/a>
Summary Judgment for Haiti Earthquake Photographer<\/em>
Agence France Presse v. Morel<\/p>\n

1st Cir.:  Photographic Memory: Docudrama\u2019s Recreation of Photograph Not a Copyright Infringement<\/a>
Court Analyzes Protection for News Photography<\/em>
Harney v. Sony Pictures Television, Inc.<\/p>\n

C.D. Cal.:  Hobbit Poaching Is Not Allowed: TRO Granted To Prevent Release Of \u201cAge Of Hobbits”<\/a>
Defendant Sought to Capitalize on Popular Film<\/em>
Warner Brothers Entertainment v. The Global Asylum<\/p>\n

MLRC  <\/h3>\n

2013 MLRC\/Southwestern Law School 10th Annual Media and Entertainment Law Conference<\/a><\/p>\n

LIBEL & PRIVACY<\/h3>\n

Iowa Expands Definition of \u201cMedia Defendant,\u201d Retains Libel Per Se Cause of Action<\/a>
Court Looks at Media vs. Nonmedia in the Digital Age<\/em>
Bierman v. Weier<\/p>\n

Seventh Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Privacy Suit Against Joan Rivers
<\/a>Documentary Scene Not Private, Use Was Incidental <\/em>
Bogie v. Rivers<\/p>\n

Tex. App.: Univision Wins Texas SLAPP Law Appeal<\/a>
First Appellate Decision on the Merits of the Texas Anti-SLAPP Statute <\/em>
Avila & Univision Television Group, Inc. v. Larrea<\/p>\n

Ninth Circuit Finds That SLAPPing Superman Can Be Subject to Immediate Review in Federal Courts<\/a>
Denial of Anti-SLAPP Motion Is Appealable <\/em>
DC Comics v. Pacific Pictures Corporation<\/p>\n

ACCESS<\/h3>\n

Maine Supreme Judicial Court Intervenes on 24-Hours Notice to Stop Secret Jury Selection in \u201cZumba\u201d Prostitution Case<\/a>
Decisive Action to Enforce and Apply Press-Enterprise I<\/em>
In Re Maine Today Media, Inc.<\/p>\n

S.D.N.Y.:  Judge Denies NYT Access to DOJ\u2019s Legal Memos About Drone Strikes<\/a>
Exemptions for Classified and Deliberative Documents Applied<\/em>
New York Times Co. v. United States DOJ<\/p>\n

Maryland State Education Board Reaffirms Legal Notice Advertising Law<\/a>
Decision Bolsters Public Interest in Newspaper Industry<\/em>
Dunloy Townhome Condominium, Inc. v. Baltimore County Board of Education<\/p>\n

INTERNET<\/h3>\n

California Attorney General Cracks Down on Apps That Fail to Comply With Privacy Law<\/a><\/p>\n

FIRST AMENDMENT<\/h3>\n

California Issues Important Ruling on Labor Speech Rights of Unions on Private Property<\/a>
Ralphs Grocery Could Lead to a Review of the Issue by the U.S. Supreme Court<\/em>
Ralphs Grocery Company v. United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 8 <\/p>\n

ETHICS<\/h3>\n

Revisiting the 2003 Ethics Corner: Surreptitious Taping by Lawyers<\/a>
Hidden Taping by Lawyers and Advice About Such Secret Taping<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":79,"template":"","issues-publication":[1002],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nMediaLawLetter January 2013 - Media Law Resource Center<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-january-2013\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"MediaLawLetter January 2013 - Media Law Resource Center\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\" Download Publication INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY S.D.N.Y.:  The True Meaning of \u2018Service\u2019: Media Entities Struggle With Court Interpretation of Twitter\u2019s Terms of Service and What Services Getty ProvidesSummary Judgment for Haiti Earthquake PhotographerAgence France Presse v. Morel 1st Cir.:  Photographic Memory: Docudrama\u2019s Recreation of Photograph Not a Copyright InfringementCourt Analyzes Protection for News PhotographyHarney v. Sony Pictures...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-january-2013\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Media Law Resource Center\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-08-20T19:01:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/03\/pdf_small.gif\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"16\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"16\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/gif\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-january-2013\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-january-2013\/\",\"name\":\"MediaLawLetter January 2013 - Media Law Resource Center\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-january-2013\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-january-2013\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/03\/pdf_small.gif\",\"datePublished\":\"2013-02-07T20:35:38+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-08-20T19:01:53+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-january-2013\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-january-2013\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-january-2013\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/03\/pdf_small.gif\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/03\/pdf_small.gif\",\"width\":16,\"height\":16,\"caption\":\"pdf\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-january-2013\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"MediaLawLetter\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issues\/publication\/medialawletter\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"MediaLawLetter January 2013\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/\",\"name\":\"Media Law Resource Center\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"MediaLawLetter January 2013 - Media Law Resource Center","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-january-2013\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"MediaLawLetter January 2013 - Media Law Resource Center","og_description":" Download Publication INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY S.D.N.Y.:  The True Meaning of \u2018Service\u2019: Media Entities Struggle With Court Interpretation of Twitter\u2019s Terms of Service and What Services Getty ProvidesSummary Judgment for Haiti Earthquake PhotographerAgence France Presse v. Morel 1st Cir.:  Photographic Memory: Docudrama\u2019s Recreation of Photograph Not a Copyright InfringementCourt Analyzes Protection for News PhotographyHarney v. Sony Pictures...","og_url":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-january-2013\/","og_site_name":"Media Law Resource Center","article_modified_time":"2020-08-20T19:01:53+00:00","og_image":[{"width":16,"height":16,"url":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/03\/pdf_small.gif","type":"image\/gif"}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-january-2013\/","url":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-january-2013\/","name":"MediaLawLetter January 2013 - Media Law Resource Center","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-january-2013\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-january-2013\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/03\/pdf_small.gif","datePublished":"2013-02-07T20:35:38+00:00","dateModified":"2020-08-20T19:01:53+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-january-2013\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-january-2013\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-january-2013\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/03\/pdf_small.gif","contentUrl":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/03\/pdf_small.gif","width":16,"height":16,"caption":"pdf"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-january-2013\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"MediaLawLetter","item":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issues\/publication\/medialawletter\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"MediaLawLetter January 2013"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/","name":"Media Law Resource Center","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/post_issue\/4012"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/post_issue"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post_issue"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/79"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4012"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"issues-publication","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/issues-publication?post=4012"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}