{"id":3583,"date":"2012-06-18T19:39:12","date_gmt":"2012-06-18T19:39:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/medialawletter-associate-edition-2012-issue-2\/"},"modified":"2020-08-20T19:01:54","modified_gmt":"2020-08-20T19:01:54","slug":"medialawletter-associate-edition-2012-issue-2","status":"publish","type":"post_issue","link":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-associate-edition-2012-issue-2\/","title":{"rendered":"MediaLawLetter Associate Edition 2012 Issue 2"},"content":{"rendered":"
Published June 2012<\/em><\/p>\n UK: English Libel Changes: The Defamation Bill 2012<\/a> UK: Newspaper Wins Privacy \/ Harassment Trial<\/a> Canada: Supreme Court of Canada Rolls Out Welcome Mat for Libel Tourists<\/a> UK: Other Side of the Pond: Developments in UK Media Law<\/a> Australia: Shield Laws Down Under<\/a> Second Circuit Reverses a Troubling Federal District Court Decision Affecting The Rights Of Copyright Owners To Combat Online Piracy<\/a> Fourth Circuit Decision Sets Up Keyword Trademark Cases for Trial<\/a> US Supreme Court to Hear First Sale Copyright Doctrine Case<\/a> 2d Cir.: Appropriation Artist Tests the Scope of \u2018Fair Use\u2019 with the Second Circuit<\/a> U.S. Mil.: Press Asserts Constitutional Right of Access to Guantanamo Commissions<\/a> D.D.C.: Federal Court Rejects FOIA Request for Bin Laden Photos<\/a>INTERNATIONAL LIBEL & PRIVACY<\/h3>\n
Changes to English Libel Law Likely to Be Enacted Into Law By Next Year<\/em><\/p>\n
Court Gives Leeway to Report on Lives of Public Figures<\/em>
Trimingham v. Associated Newspapers Ltd<\/a><\/p>\n
Defamation \u201cOccurs\u201d When and Where Defamatory Statement Is Published to Third Party <\/em>
Breeden v. Black; \u00c9ditions \u00c9cosoci\u00e9t\u00e9 Inc. v. Banro Corp.<\/p>\n
Scandalizing the Court; Access to Extradition Docs; Twiter Libel; ISP Liability and More<\/em>
In R (Guardian News and Media Limited) v the City of Westminster Magistrates Court; Cairns v Modi; Tamiz v Google Inc.<\/p>\n
Decision That Newspaper Divulge Sources Now on Appeal<\/em>
Liu v The Age Company Limited<\/p>\nINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY<\/h3>\n
Court Addresses Issue of Red Flags and Willful Blindness Under DMCA<\/em>
Viacom v. YouTube<\/p>\n
Trial Required to Decide Trademark Infringement Evidence<\/em>
Rosetta Stone. Ltd. v. Google<\/p>\n
Does Doctrine Apply to Works Produced Abroad and Resold in the U.S.?<\/em>
Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.<\/p>\n
Volley of Questions For Both Sides In Oral Arguments Leaves Outcome Murky<\/em>
Cariou v. Prince<\/p>\nACCESS<\/h3>\n
First Time Media Permitted To Make Access Motion <\/em>
U.S. v. Abd al Rahim Hussayn Muhammad al Nashiri<\/p>\n
Photos Were Properly Classified in Interest of National Security
Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of Defense<\/p>\nINTERNET<\/h3>\n