{"id":2072,"date":"2010-01-01T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-01-01T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/medialawletter-january-2010\/"},"modified":"2020-10-12T21:37:52","modified_gmt":"2020-10-12T21:37:52","slug":"medialawletter-january-2010","status":"publish","type":"post_issue","link":"https:\/\/medialaw.org\/issue\/medialawletter-january-2010\/","title":{"rendered":"MediaLawLetter January 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/a><\/span><\/strong> Download Publication<\/a><\/span> U.S.: Citizens United: Campaign Cataclysm or Politics as Usual?<\/a> U.S.: Supreme Court Addresses Right of Access to Voir Dire<\/a> U.S.: Court To Hear First Amendment Challenge to State Public Records Act<\/a> U.S.: Deeply Split Supreme Court Bars Cameras in Prop. 8 Same-Sex Marriage Trial<\/a> <\/a>MLRC\/Southwestern Law School 7th Annual Entertainment and Media Law Conference<\/a><\/p>\n <\/a>Mass.: Fair Report Privilege Applicable To Reports Of Confidential Government Actions Based On Anonymous Sources<\/a><\/a><\/a> Tex. App.: Texas Weekly Newspaper Loses Battle To Protect Confidential Sources And Avoid Libel Trial<\/a> N.J. App.: Truth is a Defense to Defamation Claim Despite Expungement<\/a> Cal. App.: Summary Judgment for Newspaper Affirmed on Appeal<\/a> 4th Cir.: Court Affirms Consumer Website\u2019s Sec. 230 Immunity in Defamation Case<\/a> Pa. Comm.: Court Dismisses Libel Lawsuit Arising From Satire in Legal Newspaper<\/a> S.D. W. Va: Rigorous Standard of Review for Libel-by-Implication Claims<\/a> Cal. App.: Damage Award in Michael Jackson Illegal Videotape Case Overturned<\/a> Fla. App.: Reporter Can Blog Live From Trial<\/a> Ill.: Opposite Outcomes in Two High Profile Illinois Access Cases<\/a> Kan.: Court Orders Reporter to Disclose Confidential Source<\/a> <\/a>UK: Other Side of the Pond: Lord Justice Jackson Libel Report Produces Important Changes For Defendants<\/a> France: French Court Rules That Google Books Violates French Law<\/a> UK: Court Refuses to Enforce US Copyright Judgment or Hear US Copyright Infringement<\/a> <\/a>The \u201cProspective Client\u201d Under Model Rule 1.18 and Motions to Disqualify<\/a>
<\/span><\/p>\nSUPREME COURT<\/h3>\n
1st Amendment Bars Categorical Distinctions Based on Corporate Identity<\/em>
Citizens United v. FEC<\/p>\n
Courts Must Independently Consider Alternatives to Closing Court Proceedings<\/em>
Presley v. Georgia<\/p>\n
Case Involves Disclosure of Petition Signers<\/em>
Doe v. Reed<\/p>\n
An Analysis In Favor of Camera Access<\/em>
Hollingsworth v. Perry<\/p>\nMLRC<\/h3>\n
LIBEL & PRIVACY<\/h3>\n
Privilege Applies Even if Based on Confidential Sources<\/em>
Howell v. Enterprise Publishing Company, LLC<\/p>\n
Newspaper Needs Help Raising Money for Imminent Trial<\/em>
Klentzman and Carter Publications, Inc. d\/b\/a The West Fort Bend Star, Inc. v. Wade Brady<\/p>\n
Case of First Impression in New Jersey<\/em>
G.D. v. Kenny et al.<\/p>\n
Denial of Anti-SLAPP Motion Not Law of the Case on Summary Judgment<\/em>
Portner v. Sullivan<\/p>\n
Website Did Not Create Consumer Complaints<\/em>
Nemet Chevrolet, Ltd v. Consumeraffairs.com, Inc.<\/p>\n
No Evidence of Actual Malice<\/em>
Leber v. Young<\/p>\n
Defendant Must Intend or Endorse Implication<\/em>
Tomblin v. WCHS-TV8<\/p>\n
$20 Million Award Excessive<\/em>
Geragos v. Borer<\/p>\nACCESS<\/h3>\n
Court Quashed Trial Court Order Baring Use of Laptop to Live Blog<\/em>
Morris Publishing Co., LLC v. State of Florida<\/p>\n
Different Approaches to Pretrial Publicity in Criminal Cases<\/em>
People v. R. Kelly; People v. Peterson<\/p>\nREPORTERS PRIVILEGE<\/h3>\n
State Supreme Court Issues Emergency Stay Pending Appeal<\/em>
GateHouse Media Kansas Holdings II, Inc. v. The Hon. Daniel L. Love<\/p>\nINTERNATIONAL<\/h3>\n
Dramatic Changes Proposed for Conditional Fee Arrangements<\/em><\/p>\n
Digitizing and Availability in France Violates IP Law<\/em>
Editions la Martini\u00e8re v. Google, Inc., Google France<\/p>\n
ClaimCopyright Enforcement Analyzed in \u201cStormtrooper\u201d Helmet Case<\/em>
Lucasfilm Limited v Ainsworth<\/p>\nETHICS<\/h3>\n
Case Law on Rule 1.18<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":79,"template":"","issues-publication":[1002],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n