Log in to access all content
Not a member yet?
Join MLRC today!
We provide you with essential tools to advance First Amendment and media rights, and a supportive community in which to discuss emerging legal issues and the future of communication.
Not a member yet?
We provide you with essential tools to advance First Amendment and media rights, and a supportive community in which to discuss emerging legal issues and the future of communication.
By Eric P. Robinson On Aug. 5, California Governor Jerry Brown approved a new statute which clarifies that jurors may not use social media and the Internet – such as texting, Twitter, Facebook, and Internet searches – to research or disseminate information about cases, and can be held in criminal or civil contempt for violating these…
Holds Interests of All Class Members Inadequately Represented in Settlement On August 17, 2011, a three-judge panel of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, by a 2-1 margin, again vacated a district court order approving an $18 million settlement (“Settlement”) in a long running copyright dispute over the republication of freelancers’ work in electronic databases. …
Drawings of Tree Houses Not Substantially Similar By Slade R. Metcalf and Rachel F. Strom A federal judge in New York followed the Second Circuit’s novel ruling in Peter F. Gaito Architecture, LLC v. Simone Dev. Corp., 602 F.3d 57 (2d Cir. 2010) that, in copyright infringement actions, a District Court can dismiss the case…
By Drew E. Shenkman & Charles D. Tobin A Florida federal court has dismissed a copyright infringement lawsuit brought by a Florida woman against the Hawaiian publisher of Obamaland: Who is Barack Obama?, a book about President Barack Obama’s formative years in his native Hawaii. Adopting the reasoning of a magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation…
By Natalie Reid and Ivona Josipovic In late August 2011, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights held a hearing in the case of Fontevecchia & D’Amico v. Argentina, in which two Argentine journalists contend that Argentine courts breached their right to freedom of expression by upholding an invasion of privacy suit President Carlos Menem brought…
By Michael Nepple A sympathetic plaintiff’s creative attempts to avoid Section 230’s immunity provision in an action against backpage.com, LLC (“Backpage”) was unsuccessful in M.A. ex rel P.K. v. Village Voice Media Holdings, LLC, 2011 WL 3607660 (E.D. Mo. Aug. 15, 2011). The court, following controlling § 230 precedents, dismissed plaintiff’s complaint that sought to…
Citizens Have a First Amendment Right to Record Public Officials Carrying Out Their Duties in Public Places By Richard J. O’Brien, Linda R. Friedlieb & Matthew D. Taksin The growing prevalence of cell phones with audio and video recording capabilities has raised First Amendment issues in light of a handful of states’ eavesdropping statutes. The…
By Carol E. Head In the recent decision, Glik v. Cunnifee, 2011 WL 3769092 (1st Cir. Aug. 26, 2011), the First Circuit reinforced the constitutional right to make video and audio recordings of public officials discharging public duties, even if recorded by a non-traditional journalist (a passerby) using non-traditional media (a cell phone). As such,…
Rejects First Amendment Challenge to Licensing Scheme By Robert Dreps The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit has rejected a First Amendment challenge to the exclusive media rights and licensing policies of the Wisconsin Interscholastic Athletic Association at public high school athletics tournaments. Wisconsin Interscholastic Athletic Association v. Gannett Co., Inc., No. 10-2627. The…
By Collin J. Peng-Sue Last month, a New York state court judge emphasized the broad protection for a commentator’s personal views in the context of a column in the “opinion section” of a newspaper. In Rashada v. The New York Post, Index. No. 100776/11 (Sup. Ct. N.Y. Cnty. Aug. 11, 2011), Justice Saliann Scarpulla found…
No Legitimate Expectation of Privacy for Objects in Plain View By Katharine Larsen An Illinois district judge granted summary judgment in favor of CBS Broadcasting Inc. in an action involving intrusion upon seclusion and intentional infliction of emotional distress claims. Webb v. CBS Broadcasting Inc., No. 1:08-cv-06241, 2011 WL 4062488 (N.D. Ill. Sept. 13, 2011)…
By Samuel Bayard and Elizabeth McNamara On Sept. 9, 2011, Judge Freda Wolfson of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey granted summary judgment for Electronic Arts (“EA”) on the claims of a putative class of NCAA football players that EA had misappropriated their likeness and identity under New Jersey law…
By Steve Mandell, Steve Baron, and Shari Albrecht Three courts have recently ruled on motions to dismiss pursuant to Illinois’s anti-SLAPP statute, the Citizen Participation Act (CPA or ICPA). The results are mixed (two motions granted, one denied), but overall the courts have expressed a broad view of the statute’s protection. Background The CPA provides…
Photograph of Plaintiff Did Not Imply Gang Membership A California federal district court granted an anti-SLAPP motion and dismissed a defamation suit against A&E Television Networks (“A&E”) over the use of a photograph of plaintiff in an episode about a violent motorcycle gang. Alexander v. A&E Television Networks, LLC, No. 2:11-cv-00025-GEB-DAD, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS…
By Alia L. Smith Dan Snyder, the owner of the Washington Redskins, dropped his defamation action against Washington City Paper (WCP) and its reporter Dave McKenna this month, after Defendants filed a special motion to dismiss the lawsuit pursuant to D.C.’s newly-enacted anti-SLAPP legislation. The Cranky Redskins Fan’s Guide to Dan Snyder On November 19,…
Fair Report Privilege Rejected The South Carolina Court of Appeals affirmed a jury verdict against a South Carolina alternative newspaper, holding that 1) the paper was not protected by the fair report privilege and 2) the jury had sufficient evidence of fault to find in favor of the private figure plaintiff. West v. Morehead, 2011…
Professor Liable for Remarks on Radio Talk Show In an interesting non-media libel case, a Texas appellate court affirmed a jury verdict for a public figure plaintiff, holding there was clear and convincing evidence of actual malice to support the verdict. Olson v. Westergren, No. 13-10-00054-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 18, 2011) (Valdez, Rodriguez, Garza, JJ.)….
On September 7, 2011, the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division, affirmed a grant of summary judgment dismissing in full Donald J. Trump’s defamation suit against author Timothy L. O’Brien and his publisher, Time Warner Book Group Inc. and Warner Books Inc. Trump v. O’Brien, et al., No. A-6141-08T3, 2011 WL 3903013 (N.J. App….
Over 200 delegates from around the world attended MLRC’s London Conference on September 19-20 at Stationers’ Hall. This was MLRC’s seventh and largest conference in London, including lawyers from Argentina, Malaysia, Philippines and the Ukraine. The Conference began with an update on the Defamation Reform Bill from Lord Lester QC, one of the inspirations for…
Download Publication MLRC London Conference Explores International Developments in Libel, Privacy, Newsgathering and New Media Law LIBEL & PRIVACY N.J. App.: Court Affirms Summary Judgment Dismissing Donald Trump’s Defamation Claim Against Book Author and Publisher Estimates of Trump’s Wealth Not Published with Actual Malice Trump v. O’Brien Tex. App.: Court Affirms Jury Finding of Actual…